Tuesday, February 8, 2011

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

Respect. I have to say how interesting I find it that Faux News and their minions have slammed Obama every time he has correctly and politely shown deference to his diplomatic equals during State events. He bows slightly to the PM of Japan and they cry out that Obama has forfeited the future of America and shamed our people. Obama fails to wear a tie in the Oval office and he’s suddenly disrespecting the building and everyone who held the office before him.

Yet, in this weekend’s interview of President Obama performed by O’Reilly was the most disrespectful and heinously juvenile excuse for journalism I’ve seen since that jackass was on Inside Edition. Has anyone on Faux News said a word about O’Reilly interrupting the President Forty-Three…FORTY-THREE times in less than fifteen minutes? Not bloody likely. Not a word.

For all of their crowing about tradition, conservatism and maintaining the dignity of the office, Faux News allowed one of their ‘journalists’ to create one of the most unprofessional displays of self-aggrandizement I’ve ever seen. They reveled in it. In fact, they lovingly played the remainder of the interview, along with another 30+ interruptions, during O’Reilly’s show the following night.

Pathetic.

You can't have it both ways, Faux News. You can't in one breath talk about how Obama is embarrassing the nation because he's not worthy of being President while you attempt to trap and shame him in an interview. If Chris Matthews had done that same session with GWB2 you would have freaked out in a million different ways and filled up hours of cable DAT tape. Hypocrites.

Aside from stating the obvious yet again, Faux News is not news and have no professional 'journalists' that I know of or have seen. Sorry Roger Ailes, no Pulitzer for you. Ever.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

If They Only Had a Brain...

















Obamacare. Love it, hate it, be indifferent to it - we've heard plenty about it. Yet most of what you've heard is just plain wrong. Either misrepresented or misunderstood (or both), the majority of the "American People" don't have, as Paul Harvey used to call it, 'the rest of the story.'

For all of the blustering on the Right and the defensiveness on the Left, what we know is that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a compilation of healthcare reforms centered around concepts of accessibility and affordability. That it has had a relatively small impact to date, aside from providing fodder for debate, is interesting in its own right. Most aspects of the legislation will not take effect for some time. For those of you who have children with pre-existing conditions and have changed jobs or have a particularly draconian private policy, you already have benefits and protections. Few can honestly argue that this is a bad thing. Furthermore, if you have a child enrolled in college or post-graduate studies, you can now carry them on your policy up to age 26, again a good thing. Some of the more odious provisions such as the 1099 mandate and prohibiting the purchase of Over-the-Counter medications with an FSA without a doctor's prescription may fall in the near future. Yet the core of the law remains, and what everyone can agree upon, but won't, is that the law itself is everything Republicans have wanted in healthcare for years but they are afraid to admit it. The Democrats sold their soul to get what they did, and should hide their faces for having done so. That's why, and I'll take odds on this, when its all said and done Obamacare will be the law in the land this year and in years to come.

What most of us don't realize is that this 'Franken-legislation' is actually a mish-mash of positions proffered year after year by both the Right and the Left. Most importantly, the foundation of the law is that it uses private insurance to accomplish public policy, just like GWB2 did in by instituting the Medicare prescription drug benefit in his second term. Many seniors saw this to be a blessing, and it was. But the way it was done blew a trillion dollar hole in the Federal deficit. Why? Because the program prohibits the Federal government from negotiating with pharma companies on price. Medicare, by far the largest 'purchaser' of pharmaceuticals in the nation, cannot by law negotiate the prices they pay for medications. Insane. A huge give away to Big Pharma and one of the biggest lobbying wins in Washington in the last 25 years.

Why is this bad policy? Because every time we have placed any program into the hands of the private sector, we increase costs without necessarily adding quality. To that point I bring you privatization of Medicaid on the state level - a fundamental and costly disaster in Ohio and other states - and the incredible tally we pay every year for the aforementioned Prescription Drug benefit.

How does this relate to Obamacare? By adding 35+ million people to the books of private insurers we have created an enormous boon to those companies. When the Dems dropped 'public option' to get what they wanted, they forfeited the high ground - without a 'public option', private insurers have no incentive to offer a superior product with true consumer protections. Before you go all "free market" on me, please note that insurance companies do not create plans to necessarily be competitive with one another and have been repeatedly found to have been in collusion with one another. I know this is getting complicated but be patient with me here - there is a point to be made. Let's add up what we have so far. We are adding 35+ million to the roles of private insurers. We are requiring that people obtain this coverage. We are not allowing the government to participate in the competitive side of this equation, offering an affordable alternative. We are going to rely on a for-profit entity like Aetna or Cigna to determine what coverage we get, when they will pay for what, how our doctors can treat us and what we will pay. People, this is the Republican dream come true vis-a-vis one of their largest contributors, the insurance industry.

Are you getting this? Obamacare is exactly what the GOP has pushed for in separate arguments over the years. The lawsuits trying to strike down the law based on the Constitutionality of the "Individual Mandate" are all Strawman Arguments intended to misdirect attention from the fact that there is a tremendous amount of money to be made here, but the GOP and Tea Party lot need to look like they are for free markets and less government while they are pocketing tens of millions in campaign contributions. The Dems? They are just as complicit in that they ditched the 'Public Option' knowing what the ramifications were in terms of cost. For you see, they too get money from the insurance lobby, just not nearly as much. The White House has their share of blame because they spent so much political capital on healthcare too early and too loudly so they had to sell out on the real fixes in order to pass the law and not get embarrassed a'la Bill Clinton.

Who else does that leave? Why, us, of course. The American People. We will end up with a lesser option provided by for-profit insurance companies with few checks and balances that will cost us all more as we collectively absorb the increased cost of the new millions on the books - many of them who have chronic illnesses left untreated for years, ironically because they couldn't afford treatment. Lovely.

A caveat, before we close. I work in healthcare and have for years now. Nearly universally, doctors and hospitals will agree that Medicare has evolved into the easiest payer to deal with. They pay their bills on time, rarely argue with the physician about care, and do not arbitrarily deny care. Meanwhile, every day countless hours and millions are wasted by physicians and hospitals trying to get private insurance companies to pay their bills, honor their contractual commitments and allow for our doctors to care for their patients as they see fit without interference. Our spineless politicians of all stripes, by not allowing the public option, are now going to force us all into the deep end of the pool with the private insurers as lifeguards. I hope we all know how to swim.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Where There's Smoke...

Ok, it comes as no surprise that once they wrested power from the palsied hands of the Democrats, the Republicans would attack one of their favorite targets, the EPA. But in such predictable fashion? Really? How sad.

This week we've seen House Republicans introduce legislation that would, amongst other things, prohibit the EPA from regulating 'greenhouse gases'. At all. Like, nada. Well, since the Clean Air Act and other mechanisms that work to allow us to see the far horizon or actually, you know, breathe I can understand why they are anathema to any right-minded Republican. I would imagine that the dollars poured into their campaigns by the likes of Exxon/Mobile and the Koch bothers have nothing at all to do with the introduction of this particular bill.

All joking aside, to put this kind of blanket deregulation forward so soon after the catastrophic impact of the Gulf Oil spill takes some real brass ones. How are they related, you ask? Its simple. The premise being put forward by the Republicans is that industry (no matter which type) is capable of self-monitoring and all can be trusted to be good stewards of our environment. As the hamstrung yet still illuminating inquiries into the Gulf Oil spill have proven, none of the entities involved in that fiasco did the right thing despite all of the regulations we currently have in place, let alone in this proposed future state of "scout's honor". Time and again, polluting industries have failed to maintain even the minimal standards that were present under, for example, the vacuous and ineffective EPA under the Bush administration. Now that we are actually seeing the EPA do good work, the proposal is to clear-cut them to the nub. Nice.

I can see where this might clash with the far-Right's commonly-held belief in the "word of god" aspect of the bible that kind of tells us to take care of this planet of ours, but that's another post entirely.

Its one thing to be a puppet for Big Oil and the coal lobby. But to go to the baseline of no regulation and to prohibit the EPA from regulating any greenhouse gas emission, air quality provision or clean water effort is the precursor for our country to become a bleak industrial wasteland. I would ask if these men and women have children for whom they might be concerned about in terms of the legacy they leave behind - this world we are the custodians for relative to all humankind. That would be quite naive of me however, since I can tell by legislation such as this that they obviously don't give a damn about any of it.

Once again, if you aren't sitting on the board of Citgo, own 10,000 shares of a mining company or your family founded American Electric Power you can't rightfully think that this is a good idea. If you are a Republican because you like their views on tax policy, the deficit or even school prayer, you don't have to go lockstep with them on this. Its short-sighted and sells our future for a few campaign dollars. I have two kids that I would like to grow up in a world that doesn't look like the photo above. How about you?

Wake up America!